|
Search |
|
|
|
COMMENT:
Terror in
Delhi:
international ramifications
-
Ishtiaq Ahmed
The last time the Muslims were expelled from Europe it was because
religious extremism received the patronage of Ferdinand and Isabella of
Spain. If such a process gets underway now, it will be because of a
handful of extremist Muslims provoking very tolerant and liberal
societies to turn them into aggressive and intolerant majorities
On October 29, 2005 terrorists exploded three bombs in the shopping
markets of Delhi killing more than 65 people. It was the eve of the
Diwali festival, which is of the same dignity for Hindus as Eid ul Fitr
for Muslims since it has a lot to do with lights and sweets and family
reunion. Shoppers had therefore come to markets in large numbers. Eid ul
Fitr is also due in a few days and it would not be surprising if a good
number of Muslims were also shopping at that time.
Considering that only a few weeks earlier the Pakistani and Indian
Kashmirs had been mauled by a massive earthquake causing thousands of
deaths, it is the ultimate debasement of human values and empathy to
inflict more agony on innocent people in the same region.
If, now, it is established that the group which carried it out was a
Muslim outfit called the Inquilab group, irrespective of whether or not
it had a link with similar groups in Pakistan, then indeed we are once
again confronted with the shame that a group of people acting in the
name of Islam carried out a crime against humanity. It is very good that
Pakistan has condemned the outrages in very strong and clear language.
The TV images of old men and women from lower middle class families,
hysterically crying for their dear ones lost in the terrible blasts is
indictment enough from a moral and humanist point of view. We learn once
again that the evil men are still at large and that the whole world must
cooperate to bring them to book.
To believe that such dastardly acts will make the Indians pack up and
leave Kashmir can be no more than a delusion of some deranged minds.
States rarely, if ever, cave in to terror, and there is no question of
terrifying into retreat a major player with ambitions to make a mark on
world politics.
The only successful application of terror in the creation of a state was
that by various Zionist organisations that hastened the end of the
British mandate over Palestine. It succeeded because the British were
thoroughly exhausted from the ravages of World War II. The succeeding
Israeli state has shown no inclination to give in to Palestinian
militancy. Therefore trying to change the world through terror is a bad
bet even in terms of cold-blooded calculations.
What I regret most is that the peace process can again be put on hold or
be derailed altogether. But even more dreadful is the thought that
vigilante groups may start targeting Muslim minorities all over India.
Such a possibility cannot be overruled, although I am quite confident
that the Indian political institutions are strong enough to prevent
things from getting out of hand. Indeed without the connivance of the
state collective reprisals are not possible. But harassing some local
Muslim minorities on a small scale is no big deal. There is always a
limit to how long societies can tolerate threats to security. The groups
that benefit from such situations try to cash in on the popular
sentiment and surely India has no dearth of fanatical hordes.
Considering that both India and Pakistan had begun to cooperate on the
Line of Control and Indian assistance to Pakistan was growing, not only
at the level of state but also in terms of civil society contribution -
everyday one saw popular TV personalities come forward to request for
donations for both Pakistan and India. There was a feeling that the
goodwill generated at this time would pay rich dividends in terms of
peace and friendship. But as always, cold-blooded killers see such
things in another light. To them any idea of friendship between Hindus
and Muslims is anathema.
Whenever I am in India and meet Muslims they tell me that their lives
were ruined first in 1947 when they were 'abandoned'. They were advised
to become good Indian citizens. Whenever India and Pakistan are in
bellicose postures or the Kashmiris bring their terrorism to India,
their lives are again menaced. I sometimes wonder if the Kashmiri
militants ever consider how seriously they jeopardise the lives of their
co-religionists by their killing sprees in India.
Terrorism is no longer seen as a local or regional menace. The Delhi
carnage is likely once again to make experts on terrorism and
politicians all over the world wonder whether Islam is particularly
amenable to acts of barbarity or such activities are the evil doing of
small, secretive groups of fanatics. Thus far the saner elements are
emphasising that extremists are a tiny minority among Muslims. I would
also like to believe that it is them and not Islam that is to blame. But
I wonder for how long the world will find it important to make such
distinctions.
There is no historical parallel on which to base reactions to
international terrorism but as a student of history I know that it does
not take long for peaceful societies to transform into intolerant and
extremist ones if they feel vulnerable and threatened. God forbid, but
in such circumstances genocide of minorities does takes place sooner or
later.
Only recently the Danish authorities have arrested five Muslim youths,
born and brought up in Scandinavia, on charges of planning terrorist
actions in Europe. Already the Danish mass media has been whipping up
anti-Muslim feelings and the Muslims in Denmark feel beleaguered. More
than 70 percent of Swedes think that Islamic and Swedish values are not
compatible. The anti-Muslim sentiment is also growing in the Netherlands
and Belgium. We already know that in France, Germany, Spain and UK the
public opinion is increasingly apprehensive of the Muslim presence.
The last time the Muslims were expelled from Europe it was because
religious extremism received the patronage of Ferdinand and Isabella of
Spain. If such a process gets underway now, it will be because of a
handful of extremist Muslims provoking very tolerant and liberal
societies to turn them into aggressive and intolerant majorities
directing their ire against hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants
who have nothing to do with extremism.
The author is an associate professor of political science at
Stockholm University. He is the author of two books. His email address
is [email protected] |