About Us

Contact Us

Activities

Press Releases

Islam & Democracy

Join Now

Feedback

    MSD Declaration

    Contact Us

    Activities

    Press Release

    Debate

    Join Now

    Feedback

 

Sectarian violence in Bangladesh stems from Wahhabi doctrines
By A.H. Jaffor Ullah 

I was appalled reading the news that on Monday, January 12, 2004, bombs were blasted in nation’s premier Sufi shrine in Sylhet.  This scribe knows the importance of Shahjalal’s shrine in Sylhet.  Every time we went to Sylhet town to visit my maternal grandmother we used to visit the shrine, feed the gigantic fish, and collect some water that the local folks believed to have magical quality.  The shrine is still considered a holy place in Bangladesh.  Back then in the 1950s many Hindus in Sylhet town used to revere the place.  Such is the charm of Sufi Islam.  However, we now live in a different world.  A world mired with religious fanaticism and extremism. 

We have seen the transformation of our docile society into a violent one in the late 1990s when a spate of bombing had rocked our cities and towns.  In all the cases the extremists who were hell bent to cause destruction of life and properties that they considered their enemy had targeted secular organizations, political parties, mina bazaars, cinema halls, church, etc. for bomb blasts.  Lately, the Daily Star started to use the term “bigot” to refer to the Islamic fundamentalists who many in Bangladesh believe to be the planner and executioners of these bomb blasts. 

One may question as to why the Islamic extremists and terrorists are targeting an innocuous site such as the Sufi Shrine of Hazrat Shahjalal.  The neo-religionists in Bangladesh who have embraced Wahhabi doctrine heart and soul have conveniently forgotten that many Sufi saints spread Islam among South Asians.  To unearth the truth all one has to do is visit the four corners of Bangladesh.  There are many Sufi shrines scattered all over our motherland.  However, with the advent of Wahhabism and thanks to Tablig Al-Jamaat for this vital transformation of our society many neo-religionists now say that Islam should be purified in Bangladesh.  Many political leaders belonging to Jamaat-i-Islam also show their open disdain for Sufi brand of Islam, which is also known as folk Islam.  The Wahhabites and practitioners of political Islam wanted very much to transform Bangladesh into a hard-core Islamic nation.  No wonder we have so many political parties in Bangladesh that sell political Islam to our gullible hoi polloi.   

Recently, sectarianism has reared its ugly head in Bangladesh.  This has caused some concern among secularists and moderates in the nation.  In their fervor to “purify” Islam, the Wahhabites and other hard-core Islamists have joined forces to declare Ahmadiyas, a minority Muslim sect in Bangladesh as non-Muslims.  Now the onslaught on nation’s premier Sufi shrine on January 12, 2004, in which 3 people have died and 37 injured is a grim reminder that sectarian violence is on the rise.  

The seed of sectarianism was planted a long time ago in Bangladesh.  In 1999, this scribe wrote a piece in Daily Star entitled “Freedom at Midnight.”  The impetus for writing that satirical article came from the news that two rival Islamic groups clashed on midnight in the outskirt of Dhaka city in Badda.  The Islamists belonging to Wahhabism makes no bone about their disdain for Sufi Muslims who performs such rituals as Milad to show their reverence for prophet Muhammad.  The Sufis also visit Dargah or shrines of Aolias or Dervishes.  They also celebrate the birth anniversaries of the Muslim saints, which are popularly known as Urs.  To taunt the folks who adhere to the age-old folk Islam the Wahhabites call these rituals as “Mazar Culture.”  Many neo-Islamists belonging to political party Jamaat-i-Islam openly put down the practitioners of Sufi Islam as some kind of deviants.  They conveniently forget that Islam was spread in our part of the world by Sufi saints from distant land.  In fact, Sufism started in Iraq, Turkey, Persia, and in the vicinity probably in the 9th and 10th century.   Many scholars have described Sufism in many different ways in English, throughout this century, but they all tend to agree on its essential character as being the inner, esoteric, mystical, or purely spiritual dimension of the religion of Islam.  

The neo-Islamists have vague understanding of Sufism.  In fact, Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the spiritual leader of Wahhabi doctrine saw the danger of Sufi Islam as he visited Iran in 1736.   He immediately began to teach against what he considered the extreme ideas of various exponents of Sufi doctrines.  When Wahhab returned to Arabia he wrote the “Kitab at-tawhid’ (“Book of Unity”), which is the main text for Wahhabi doctrines.  About 250 years later, we find that the Wahhabites of modern times are out there to purify Islam in Bangladesh.  It is noteworthy that the spiritual strength of al-Qaeda organization stems from Wahhabi doctrines.  The 9-11 terrorist attack was possible because of intolerance amongst a certain faction of Wahhabites.  The same mentality is at work in Bangladesh; therefore, the terrorists who set the bomb in Sufi shrine in Sylhet must be thinking that they are doing a favor to Islam by creating panic amongst ordinary Muslims who often visit Sufi shrines in search of peace and to bring solace to angst-ridden minds.   

It is noteworthy that Abd al-Wahhab's teachings could be characterized as puritanical and traditional, representing the early era of the Islamic religion.  Wahhab made a clear stand against all innovations (bid'ah) in Islamic faith since he believed them to be reprehensible, insisting that the original grandeur of Islam could be regained if the Islamic community would return to the principles enunciated by the Prophet Muhammad.  Wahhabi doctrines, therefore, abhors the idea of an intermediary such as pir, aolia, dervishes, etc., between the faithful and Allah and condemn any such practice as polytheism.  In the same vein, the decoration of mosques, the cult of saints, and even the smoking of tobacco were condemned by Wahhabi teachings.  The hateful preaching of Abd al-Wahhab led to controversy so much so that he was expelled from 'Uyaynah in 1744.   He then settled in Ad-Dir'iyah, capital of Ibn Sa'ud, a ruler of the Najd (now in Saudi Arabia).  The spread of Wahhabism was possible because of an alliance that was formed between Abd al-Wahhab and Ibn Sa'ud.  Later, Sa’ud’s heirs in Arabian Peninsula continued a campaign of conquest.  They made Wahhabism the dominant force in Arabia since 1800.  In twentieth century, the Saudi started to export Wahhabism to other Muslim majority nations.  In South Asia, they targeted the Deoband Madrassah in U.P. The Deobandis then spread Wahhabism to erstwhile East Pakistan targeting the mosque at Kakrail.  Bishwa Ejtema is a brainchild of a Deoband maulana.  The spread of Wahhabi doctrines had made Bishwa Ejtema a thriving event in Bangladesh.  One of the aftereffects of Wahhabi Islam is the spread of sectarian violence in South Asia.  Pakistan is a case in point.  It looks as if though Bangladesh is following the Pakistani Model.   

Bangladesh should reject sectarian violence by all means.  This is a virus whose spread should be minimized.  The bombing of Sufi shrine in Sylhet by the extremist is an ominous sign.  Members of the civil society should maintain their vigilance to wipe out any traces of religious extremism from Bangladesh.     

------------------------------                      

Dr. A.H. Jaffor Ullah, a columnist and researcher, writes from New Orleans, USA

 

This site is still under construction. Please visit again for more updates.