About Us

Contact Us

Activities

Press Release

Islam & Democracy

Join Now

Feedback

    About Us

    Contact Us

    Activities

    Press Release

    Debate

    Join Now

    Feedback

YOU ARE INVITED

Two-Day National Workshop 

Towards an All-India
“Citizens Campaign: Implement
Sachar Committee’s Recommendations”
 

Organised by
Muslims for Secular Democracy (MSD) and Communalism Combat
 

Venue: Islam Gymkhana, Marine Drive, Mumbai. 

Dates: January 27 (Saturday) and January 28 (Sunday), 2007.

Ever since its release, the Sachar Committee’s Report on the socio-economic status of the Muslim Community in India has generated a lot of discussion within the community as also among secular organisations and individuals.

In a nutshell, on the basis of voluminous data collected by it, the Sachar Committee has conclusively established that:

-- In the 60 years since Independence, India’s Muslims have been sliding down even as other Socio-Religious Communities (SRCs) continue to climb up the development ladder.

-- The community is falling behind not because of some inherent resistance to educational and economic progress on its part, but because it is a victim of neglect and/or in-built systemic bias both in governmental institutions and in the private sector.

The Union Minister for Minority Affairs, Mr. A. R. Antulay, has publicly stated that his government is sincere in its intentions and committed to act on the findings and implement the recommendations of the Committee. Many Muslims however remain skeptical. They believe that with elections in the crucial state of UP around the corner, this is just another political ploy of the Congress to woo Muslim voters, that once elections are over the government would again do nothing. They rightly point out that even parties that call themselves secular have done next to nothing in the past in response to the recommendations of earlier such committees and commissions.

We too believe that left to itself governments in fact would do little or nothing to address the problem of gross neglect and bias. But we also believe that an active citizenry could force governmental action.

The success of Citizens for Justice and Peace in bringing justice to the victims of the Gujarat Genocide (2002), and the campaign of other social activists that culminated in the Right to Information Act are recent reminders that given commitment and tenacity on the part of civil society, remedial action is possible through judicial intervention and/or legislative/executive action.

MSD and Communalism Combat have two objectives in mind in organising the proposed Two-Day workshop:

-- The immediate objective is to increase public awareness about and promote informed discussion and debate on the findings and recommendations of the Sachar Committee;

-- The broader objective is to make a modest contribution towards the launch of a national campaign for the implementation of the Sachar Report.

Venue: Islam Gymkhana, Marine Drive, Mumbai.

Dates: January 27 (Saturday) and January 28 (Sunday).

Themes for the Workshop:

1.     Affirmative Action:

The Sachar Report has made a strong case for affirmative action (in the field of education, employment, access to credit, infrastructural facilities and political representation) as the only means of improving the socio-economic situation of Muslims. At the same time it points out that Muslims are not a homogeneous community but are stratified in three distinct groups: ashraf, ajlaf and arzals. The Report argues for the need for group-specific affirmative action plans for the three socio-economic groups among Muslims.

While the need for affirmative action is widely recognised, opinion remains divided even among Muslims over the forms it should take. Some argue for religion-based reservation. Others are strongly opposed to this both on grounds of principle (you can’t have religion-based reservations in a secular state) as also on strategic and tactical grounds (the relatively-better placed ashraf would corner all the benefits of reservation; religion-based reservation will fuel the hate politics of the sangh parivar wiping off any benefit that accrues to the community).

What would be the most appropriate forms of affirmative action given the Indian reality?

2.     The Gender question:

It is unfortunate that there was no gender representation in the high-level committee appointed by the Prime Minister. For this reason or otherwise, the fact is that the gender-specific concerns of Muslim women are only cursorily dealt with by the Sachar Committee. We, therefore, propose to allot extra-time to this issue during the consultation. We are happy to be associated with Awaaz-e-Niswan, a Mumbai-based Muslim women’s group, in conducting this particular session.

3.     The Security Issue:

In its report Sachar Committee observes that three issues dominate the concerns of a minority community in any society: identity issues, security issue, equity issues. While affirming that the three issues are closely linked to each other, the Committee has observed that given its mandate it has remained focussed on equity issues.

Be that as it may, the fact is that particularly after the Mumbai and Gujarat carnage, security of life and property has emerged as the core concern of India’s Muslims and other minorities. Should this not, therefore, form an integral part of any Muslim/secular initiative or campaign aimed at improving the lot of Muslims?

4.     Solutions Within:

There are several pointers in the findings and recommendations of the Committee that could be the starting point for discussions of initiatives within the Muslim community itself that could go a long way in improving the lot of the community as a whole. We propose a special session that will have intra-community initiative as its focus.

5.     Towards a National Campaign:

As stated above we believe that left to themselves, central and state governments, or the organised private sector are unlikely to pro-actively implement the Committee’s recommendations. Citizens groups will have to consider ways and means of launching a sustained national campaign among other initiatives to see that action is taken on the Sachar Report.

While a lot of groundwork would be needed before any effective national campaign can be launched, we see the proposed consultation as a part of that process.

Workshop Schedule:

Day One (January 27, 2006): Morning Session:

Introduction

10.00– 10.30: Registration of Participants.

10.30 – 10.40: Welcome Speech, Mr. Gulam Mohd. Peshimam, Convenor, MSD.

10.40 – 10.50: Introductory Remarks, Mr. Javed Akhtar, President, MSD.

10.50 – 11.05: Highlights, Sachar Report, Mr. Javed Anand, General Secretary, MSD.

11.05 – 11.30: Sachar Report: Vision and Intent, Dr. T.K. Ooman, Member, Sachar Committee.

11.30 – 11.50: Comments and questions.

11.50 – 12.05: Tea Break

1. Affirmative Action: Education/Employment/Credit/Infrastructure

12.05 – 12.25: Affirmative Action, Diversity Programmes: The American Experience, Aroosha Rana & Saad Bukhari, US Consulate Mumbai/Chennai.

12.25 – 12.45: Comments and questions.

12.45 – 1.05: “Reservations for SCs/STs in India: The Dalit Experience”,                       Mr. Rajshekhar Vundru, I.A.S.

1.05 – 1.25: Comments and questions.

1.25 – 2.10: Lunch Break

Day One (January 27, 2006): Afternoon Sessions

2.10 – 2.30: “Affirmative Action & Indian Muslims: The Caste Dimension”,
Mr. Hasan Kamaal, Advisor, Muslim All Backward Classes (ABC) Association.

2.30 – 2.50: Comments and questions. 

2. Leveraging Existing Institutional Provisions  

2.50 – 3.10: Constitutional guarantees and Indian Muslims: How the                     National Commission for Minorities can help: Mr. Syed Hamid Ansari, Chairman, National Commission for Minorities. 

3.10 – 3.30: Comments and questions. 

3.30 – 3.45: Tea Break

 3.45 – 4.05: Muslim Educational Backwardness and Role of the State: Prof. Mushirul Hasan, V-C, Jamia Millia, Delhi.

4.05 – 4.25: Comments and questions.

 3. Right To Life and Property: Paper Promises

 4.25 – 4.45: Violence (Mob/Bomb/State), Bill on Communal Violence: Ms.Teesta Setalvad, Co-editor, Communalism Combat, Secretary, Citizens for Justice and Peace.

 4.45 – 5.05: Wanted: An unbiased, representative police, Mr. Suresh Khopade, Police Commissioner (Railways), Mumbai, (Author and architect of Bhiwandi’ Mohalla Committees); confirmation awaited from other senior police officials.

5.05 – 5.30: Comments and questions.

5.30 – 6.00: Open Forum.

Day Two (January 28, 2006): Morning Sessions

4. Muslim Women: The Hidden Dimension

11.00 – 12.00:         Sub-Themes:

State and Community: Seizing Citizenship;

Muslim Women in Development and Rights Discourse;

Participatory Solutions. Speakers (include): Ms. Azhra Razak,

Ms. Shama Dalwai, Ms. Teesta Setalvad, Dr. Zeenat Shaukatali,  Awaaz-e-Niswan. 

12.00 – 12.15: Tea Break 

12.15 – 1.45: Muslim Women: The Hidden Dimension (Cont).

1.45 - 2.05: Comments and questions.

2.05 – 2.45: Lunch Break

Day Two (January 28, 2006): Afternoon Sessions

5. Solutions Within

2.45 – 3.15: Muslim Education: Lessons from South India, Dr. Syed Iqbal Hasnain, former V-C, Calicut University.

3.15 – 3.35: Comments and questions. 

3.35 – 4.00: Muslim Philanthropy (zakaat), Wakf Boards: Wasted Resources,                   Professor Imtiaz Ahmed. 

4.00 – 4.20: Comments and questions.

4.20 – 4.35: Tea Break.

4.35 – 4.55: The Right to Information: A Tool to Combat Discrimination,
Mr.
Shailesh Gandhi, Information Right activist.  

4.50 – 5.00: Comments and questions.

5.00 – 5.10: Jihad Against Terrorism: Citizens Campaign Against Violence
(mob, bomb or state) Javed Anand, MSD.

5.10 – 5.20: Comments and questions.

6. Towards A National Citizens Campaign

5.20 – 6.00: Open Session

6.00 – 6.10: Concluding Remarks, Javed Akhtar, President, MSD.

6.10 – 6.15: Vote of Thanks, Asif Khan, Secretary, MSD.                                      

For further information:

Javed Anand

(M) 09870402556; Ph/Fax: 022-2660 22 88.  e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]