Role of Non-BJP Parties
1. National Democratic Alliance
1.1. The BJP’s allies in the National
Democratic Alliance government at the Centre were shaken by the violence
in Gujarat but failed to go beyond shedding the usual crocodile tears.
The Tribunal notes with anguish that the allies in the NDA who claim to
continue to be wedded to democracy and secularism, did nothing more than
issue statements after the Gujarat carnage. Much more was expected from
them and history will hold them guilty for failing to rise to the
occasion, putting narrow political considerations aside and using all
the strength at their command to ensure that the central government
acted and acted swiftly to control the Gujarat carnage. This they did
not do, and hence, a government indicted before the country and the
world continues to be in power in Gujarat today.
1.2. The Tribunal has no great
expectations that the NDA allies will do anything in future to assure
the physical, emotional and economic rehabilitation of Muslims in
Gujarat. However, it observes that the NDA allies must push for a proper
rehabilitation of, and justice for, the victim-survivors if their claim
to be wedded to the Indian Constitution is to have any meaning.
2. Role of the Opposition Parties
2.1. The role of the opposition
Congress party in the state of Gujarat, though vociferous in demanding
the dismissal of the Modi government, was obviously lacking in any
political or moral resolve while the violence was actually taking place.
Former MP Shri Ahsan Jafri, who belonged to this party, was killed along
with others after, after his house had been besieged for 8 long hours
and during which period he made innumerable calls for help. The Tribunal
finds it shocking that not a single senior member of his party went
physically to his aid, or tried, independently, to contact the police
commissioner to ensure his safety. Barring a few exceptions, Congressmen
were absent while the violence was at its height. Independent MP, Shri
Madhu Sudhan Mistry from Sabarkantha and Shri Praveen Rashtrapal from
Patan are exceptions. The mayor of Ahmedabad Shri Himmatsingh Patel was
visible on television, and on the streets and in the hospitals at the
time, working for peace and helping victims. On March 5, a peace march
of prominent Gujaratis was organised by the Gujarat Lok Samiti.
Independent individuals sent out this much-needed message for peace,
against hatred. Political parties became active much later.
2.2. However, the conduct of the
Congress-controlled Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation — in aiding and
abetting the demolition of the tomb of Wali Gujarati opposite the police
commissioner’s office in Ahmedabad, or the demolition of the
100-year-old Madni mosque in Vasna, Ahmedabad, months later, is shocking
to say the least. The corporation body faced a crisis following the
resignation of 19 party corporators from various committees, in protest
against the demolition of the Madni mosque, on July 3. The Congress
mayor, Shri Himmatsingh Patel, claimed that the demolition was carried
out under instructions from Gandhinagar and the municipal commissioner
and had kept the elected representatives in the dark.
2.3. The mosque had been in the eye of
a storm for causing obstruction to traffic. However, no temples were
similarly targeted though hundreds dot Gujarat roads even in the heart
of the city. Hooligans damaged the mosque, along with nine shops
adjoining its boundary wall, during the recent violence. Repair work had
just been taken up by a private Muslim trust when municipal bulldozers
demolished it.
2.4. Objectionable bill-boards,
proclaiming Gujarat to be a ‘Hindu Rashtra’ (Hindu state) have
come up in Ahmedabad city over past months, after the carnage. "Karnavati
city of this Hindu Rashtra welcomes you," proclaims a bill-bill-board
painted in saffron in the heart of Ahmedabad. (The Times of India,
August 18, 2002). In Chhotaudaipur, 200 km south of Ahmedabad, the
bill-bill-board on the highway is more direct. It simply says: "Welcome
to Hindu Rashtra’s Chhotaudaipur town." These are a legacy of
five years of BJP rule. Though symbolic, they send out clear a message
that is entirely in tune with the ideology of the sangh parivar and the
conduct of the BJP in Gujarat. A freshly painted bill-board on a
crossroad outside Shahpur Gate in Ahmedabad proclaims the roundabout to
be ‘Kashi Vishwanath Chowk’.
2.5 The bill-boards have been put up
by the VHP, Bajrang Dal and Durga Vahini. Most of them proclaim
Dharamraksha (Protection of Faith), Rashtraraksha (Protection
of Country) and Gauraksha (Protection of Cows) as the main objectives of
these organisations. But while welcoming people to ‘Karnavati city of
Hindu Rashtra’, a bill-board at Kalupur, Ahmedabad, goes a step
further: ‘Garv Se Kaho Hum Hindu Hain’ (‘Say with pride you are a
Hindu’).
2.6. It is tragic that even the
Congress, which was returned to power in the Ahmedabad Municipal
Corporation (AMC) two years ago, is dragging its feet on pulling these
bill-bill-boards down, despite a directive to this effect issued by new
state Congress president Shankersinh Vaghela recently.
2.7. The Gujarat carnage has shown to
India and the world how some political parties that use the electoral
process to come to power work towards the steady erosion of secular and
democratic values and defiance of the Constitution through the
manipulation and misuse of the very state institutions that were created
to protect them.
2.8. The Constitution of India is
founded on a notion of representative nationhood. It is this critical
principle that gives every citizen equal rights and an equal stake in
the nation. But this constitutional provision is seriously compromised
when religious or some other sectarian identity redefines the share and
stake of different citizens in public life. For genuine secularism to be
re-injected into Indian political and public life, it is imperative that
political parties that profess commitment to secularism are undaunted in
their critique of discrimination and hate politics. Ultimately, their
actions must speak as much as words. What India badly needs today are
men and women of stature, committed to countering violence whenever and
wherever it occurs. And for this are prepared to risk their life and
limb.
3. Role of Neighbouring States
3.1. The relatively more sensitive
governance being provided by the state governments and administrations
of neighbouring Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh deserves appreciation.
3.2. Attempts were made by the Bajrang
Dal and the VHP, supported by the RSS and the BJP, to inflame sentiments
in the neighbouring districts of both Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. The
fact that there was no spill over violence in these areas is testimony
to the fact that communal tension and violence spread only when the
state wishes them to, and when it connives with such communal elements.
In the border areas of Rajasthan, commissioners of police in the cities
and SPs of districts were personally in charge for a fortnight while the
situation simmered.
3.3. While returning from Mecca, Haj
pilgrims who hail from Gujarat diverted their journey and sought refuge
in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The governments there, in sharp
contrast of the state of affairs in Gujarat, housed and fed them. They
returned only when they felt comfortable about their security.
Similarly, in Rajasthan, the local administration in the districts
bordering Panchmahal, Sabarkantha and Banaskantha actually ran refugee
camps for victims who had fled from Gujarat in terror.
3.4. On August 17, 2000, having
amended the Indian Arms Act, the MP government ordered a crackdown on
VHP-Bajrang Dal cadres in that state trying to foment trouble through
mass distribution of trishuls. The Indian Arms Act, 1959, prohibits
possession and carrying of sharp-edged weapons longer than six inches.
Taking advantage of this provision, the VHP had decided to distribute
Tridents measuring five-and-three-quarters of an inch. Thousands of
trishuls would have been distributed all over the state. However, the
government amended the Arms act, curtailing the permissible limit to
four inches.
4. Role of Gandhian Institutions
4.1. Gandhian institutions have been a
pivotal force in the state of Gujarat. In the past they have had a
significant influence on political forces like the Congress(O). However,
since 1977, their distance from active politics has played a significant
role in their declining influence. The absence of any organisational
work among the young, too, has contributed to this. These factors
culminating in an active distancing from active politics have added to
their declining influence. Gandhian organisations, which number over
2,000 in the state of Gujarat and are beneficiaries of state funds, have
therefore lost the stature they had in past decades. Individually,
senior Gandhians have condemned violence and communalism. But their
silence in some significant cases, and open allegiance to stances taken
by Hindutvavadi organisations on occasions have further
contributed to the communalisation of civil society in Gujarat.
5. Godhra Tragedy Condemned
5.1. Among other things, the BJP and
the sangh parivar have frequently reiterated that ‘Hindu anger’
was fuelled largely by the reluctance of opposition parties, secular
groups and Muslim organisations to condemn the merciless killing of ‘kar
sevaks’ in the Sabarmati Express. This, however, is far from the
truth.
5.2. Leaders of various opposition
parties have repeatedly challenged this contention, pointing out that on
February 27 itself they had condemned the Godhra killing in unambiguous
terms. We have examined this and found the BJP and the sangh
parivar’s charge as unfounded. If their statements did not get the
prominence they deserved is of course another issue altogether that
needs to be addressed, in the first place, by the mass media.
5.3. Heads of Muslim organisations
throughout India condemned the killing of 58 passengers of the Sabarmati
Express. In a statement released on February 28, they called upon the
people of Gujarat to exercise restraint. The signatories included Shri
Syed Shahabuddin, president, All India Majlis-e-Mushawarat, Qazi
Mujahid-ul-Islam Qasmi’s Milli Council, Shri Asad Madani, president
Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Hind, Shri Saiyid Hamid, president, Movement for
Empowerment of Muslim Indians, Shri Jalaludin Umri, acting amir,
Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Shri Mohd. Yaha, president, Markazi Jamiat
Ahl-e-Hadith, Shri HR Nomani, president, All India Momin Conference,
Shri Syed Nizamuddin, general secretary, All India Muslim Personal Law
Bill-board, Shri Amanullah Khan, general secretary, Rahat Committee,
Shri M. Afzal, president, All India Urdu Editors’ Conference and Shri
Navaid Hamid, secretary, Minority Council.
5.4. Statements promptly condemning Godhra were also
made by independent citizens like Shri Javed Akhtar, Shri Alyque
Padamsee and other concerned citizens from Mumbai and elsewhere.