January February 2007 
Year 13    No.122

The Rajindar Sachar Committee Report


Wakf Boards

1. Introduction

The initiatives relating to Madarsas were discussed in Chapter 4. The other important community-specific initiative relates to Wakfs. To earmark a part of what one has earned or inherited and set it apart in perpetuity for charitable purposes is considered an act of piety. As such, generous Muslims adhering to the principles of ‘endowment’ embedded in Islam often bequeath large and valuable acreage of properties in the name of God. The proceeds from these properties are dedicated to meet the exclusive needs of the poor and also to the perpetual maintenance of the bequeathed property. This type of property bequest made by Muslims is called ‘Wakf’.

The objectives of Wakfs recognized in Islam as religious, pious and charitable include, though are not limited to, the following:

Ø Establishing, maintaining and fostering educational institutions, hostels, libraries, sports facilities and so on. Awarding of scholarships so as to promote education.

Ø Providing health care, relief and financial aid to all poor including the victims of communal riots and natural disasters.

Ø Construction of musafirkhanas and marriage halls for community use.

Ø Maintenance of mosques, dargahs, graveyards and consolidation of Wakf properties.

Ø Financial support to poor widows, indigent and physically handicapped persons; arranging the marriage of indigent girls and maintenance of divorced women.

Ø Payment of salary to Imams and Muezzins as ordered by Supreme Court.

Apart from landed (often agricultural) and built-up commercial and residential properties, Wakfs in India include Mosques, Dargahs, Khanqahs, Maqbaras, Ashoorkhanas, Qabristans (graveyards), Takiyas, Idgahs, Imambaras, Anjumans and so on.

Although the Wakf is a perpetual bequest, the Mutawallis often tend to have almost absolute control over the income generated from it.

2. Economic Potential of Wakf Assets in India

The Committee asked all the state Wakf Boards and Central Wakf Council to provide data on the nature, type and distribution of Wakf properties especially taking the location factor into account. It was expected that such data would be routinely available as the Wakf surveys of the properties have to be undertaken on a regular basis as per the Act. However, the information was not available as in many states such surveys were not up to date. Data on the income from rental and other sources were also sought. A round-table brainstorming workshop was held in Delhi to get first hand information and views about the Wakfs across India. The chairpersons and CEOs of Wakf Boards, a few academics and practitioners of Wakf law and former chairpersons of Wakf Boards participated. The Committee also received a number of representations from mutawallis and their associations.

There are more than 4.9 lakh registered Wakfs spread over different states and union territories of India. Large concentration of the Wakf properties is found in West Bengal (1,48,200) followed by Uttar Pradesh (1,22,839). Other states with a sizeable number of Wakfs are Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. The total area under Wakf properties all over India is estimated at about 6 lakh acres and the book value at about Rs. 6,000 crores. However, the market value of these properties will be higher manifold. For instance, a recent estimate of the current value of Wakf properties in Delhi alone is in excess of Rs. 6,000 crores. A good number of the Wakf properties in urban areas are found to be located in city centres where the current value is many times more than the book value. However, the current annual income from these properties is only about Rs. 163 crores, which amounts to a meagre rate of return of 2.7 percent. Of this amount the Wakf Boards are entitled to receive a share at the rate of 7% which is used for the working expenses of the Wakf Boards. The remaining amount is expected to be spent on the stated objectives of the respective Wakfs.

As the book values of the Wakfs properties are about half a century old, the current value can safely be estimated to be several times more and the market value of the Wakf properties can be put at Rs. 1.2 lakh crores. If these properties are put to efficient and marketable use they can generate at least a minimum return of 10 percent which is about Rs. 12,000 crores per annum. It has emerged from the data that wherever the Wakf lands have been put to efficient use they have generated an average return of about 20 percent. It is obvious, therefore, that if some of these Wakf properties situated in prime locations across the country are developed and put to commercial use, their market value and annual income will shoot up. The enhanced Wakf income could be utilized to upgrade the educational status and improve other human development dimensions of the beneficiaries of Wakfs. This is being done even now but such success stories are few and far between. The Committee would, however, like to put a caveat here. The optimum utilization of Wakf properties would require proper administrative back-up by the central and state governments as well as legislative support by way of crucial amendments to the Wakf Act and some other pieces of existing legislation.

3. Constraints on the Fulfilment of Wakf Objectives

To safeguard the existence of a large number of Wakf properties in India, a comprehensive Wakf Act was passed by Parliament in 1954. Over the years, during the process of the implementation of the Wakf Act, many lacunae and loopholes were noticed and the Wakf Inquiry Committee recommended amendments that were incorporated in the Wakf Act of 1995. Despite these efforts, the management of the Wakf Boards and the properties remains unsatisfactory. This is due to inadequate empowerment of the State Wakf Boards and the Central Wakf Council.

3.1 Organizational Constraints

Though there are conscientious Mutawallis too, yet there are instances where Wakfs are treated by Mutawallis as their personal properties. From dargahs the offerings are sometimes appropriated by them. In any case, Mutawallis are classically known for not coming forward to seek grants or loans from the Central Wakf Council or Wakf Boards for the development of the Wakf properties. Proposals for educational institutions are replaced by them for construction of shops. Rental is negotiated at low level in lieu of extraneous considerations. Despite the above mentioned efforts, the management of the Wakf Boards and the properties remain unsatisfactory due to inadequate empowerment of the State Wakf Boards and Central Wakf Council. Wakf properties which sub-serve the larger public interest should be protected as such. However, Wakf properties where specific religious rites are observed because of the importance of the site should be respected. Such a policy will lead to effective social cohesion and economic development. Therefore an effort should be made not to include such properties in land acquisition.

Non-availability of Records

The records of Wakf properties are not well maintained and are prone to the vagaries of weather, mutilation and loss. This calls for immediate remedial action. These should be digitized under a Government programme. The Central Government may consider special grants through the Central Wakf Council to undertake this task and supervise the quality of documentation. In spite of listing of Wakfs in statutory surveys often the properties are not registered as Wakfs in revenue records and in the records of the Local Self Governments. These lacunae and inaction on the part of the state governments are the source of prolonged litigation.

Encroachments on Wakf Properties

Encroachments on the Wakf properties are made not only by private persons but also by the government and its agencies as was brought to the notice of the Committee across the country. The encroachments are in two forms - (1) an absolute usurpation of property with no rents or other payments of any sort; and (2) those where the occupying party pays a nominal rent which has not been revised for decades. The number of private encroachments is very large. They are scattered all over the country and are often involved in litigation. Focused attention is, therefore, called for on encroachments by the State that is the custodian of the Wakf interests.

It would be seen that the attitude of the state governments and their agencies has resulted in large-scale abrogation of the cherished and charitable objectives of the Wakfs for which such endowments were created. In fact encroachment by the State on the Wakf lands, besides causing embarrassment to the authorities and emboldening private encroachers, has stood in the way of reform and reconstruction. As early as the 1970s Prime Minister Indira Gandhi wrote a letter to the Chief Ministers asking them to either vacate or pay to the Wakf Boards the market value of the Wakf properties. Alternatively, the directive was to pay lease rent at market rents for the Wakf properties encroached upon by the governments and their agencies.

3.2 Present day Management of Wakfs

To attain the objective of putting the Wakf properties to optimum use fresh institutional support is essential. Presently state Wakf Boards comprise Muslim MPs, MLAs and some others. They may not be necessarily equipped with the technical expertise and knowledge required to exploit the Wakf resources optimally. The importance of stricter monitoring of the Wakf management in general and the vacation of encroachments in particular cannot be overemphasized. The respective state governments have remained indifferent for many years and the matter once again received the Parliament’s attention and a Joint Parliamentary Committee was constituted during 1996-2006. The comprehensive recommendations of this JPC are yet awaited. However, its reports in respect of nine states (Tripura, Manipur, Maharashtra, Goa, Assam, Meghalaya, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Pondicherry, Lakshadweep) and the Ajmer Dargah Act are available on the Web:-http://RAJYASABHA.NIC.IN/BOOK2/REPORTS/WAKF/REPORTSLIST.HTML

General Issues and Constraints: Problems Faced by State Wakf Boards

Various State Wakf Boards brought to the notice of the Committee a number of problems out of which a selected few are presented here as examples. Such occurrences are detrimental to the interests of Wakf and also infringe the entitlement of its designated beneficiaries in particular and the poor in general.

Private Occupation of Prime Wakf Properties

Often Wakf properties are situated in the heart of a town/city. These are commercially valuable assets of the Wakf Boards and should be available for appropriate development and enhancement of revenues. However, such properties have often been occupied either by corporations or third parties. An effective methodology would need to be evolved for expeditious settlement of such disputes.

Overruling or Conflicting Orders by State Governments

The Minorities Department of U.P. Government has unauthorizedly passed orders overruling the quasi-judicial orders given by the Wakf Board; a copy of the most recent example of the U.P. government overruling the Wakf Board’s orders is available with the community. The Department has, in this way, been staying, overruling and vacating the Board orders. Such actions are ultra vires the Wakf Act. Both Sunni and Shia Boards drafted and submitted in 2004 the proposed Rules for the functioning of the Wakf Board and for implementation of the Wakf Act 1995. But the Department has yet to take action thereupon. While the U.P. Government could be advised to look into the matter, the Wakf Act 1995 may be amended to prevent such interference.

Transfer of Records and Jurisdiction

Due to non-transfer, delay in transfer or confusion in administrative jurisdiction, Wakf properties often suffer from mismanagement. Clarity would have to be brought about both administratively and by legislation so as to improve Wakf management.

Undoing the Trifurcation of Punjab Wakf Board

Till 2004 there was a combined Wakf Board for Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Chandigarh. The Wakf resources of all these states were pooled together and were being utilized for the people of erstwhile undivided Punjab. This provided the required flexibility in fiscal matters vis-à-vis the general welfare and particularly the provision of educational & vocational institutions and medical facilities etc. However, the trifurcation of the Wakf Board entailed huge enhancement of administrative expenditure as now there are three separate Boards and corresponding administrative infrastructure. There are 11,000 Wakf properties in Punjab but not many Muslims to take advantage therefrom. Haryana has a huge Mewat belt where a large number of Muslims are among the most backward in the country. But they can no longer enjoy the usufruct of prime Wakf properties situated in Punjab. The people of Himachal Pradesh and Chandigarh are now practically bereft of the welfare measures hitherto available to them. The Committee analysed the representations made to it in this regard and studied the issue. It is of the view that the Central Government may revert to the status quo ante and undo the trifurcation of the erstwhile Punjab Wakf Board.

Outstanding Amounts due to Wakfs

Many states have huge amounts that are outstanding but not paid to the Wakf Boards for various reasons. For example, Maharashtra Wakf Board informed the Committee that the state Government owes an amount of Rs. 81,68,285 and associated interest to the Maharashtra Wakf Board against acquisition of properties in Aurangabad, Jalna, Parbhani, Nanded, Beed, Osmanabad, Latur, Pune, Nasik, Amrawati, Sangli, Nagpur, Ahmednagar and Dhule. It is necessary that appropriate directives should be incorporated in the Wakf Act with respect to the payment of the outstanding dues within a reasonable time.

Non-implementation of the JPC Recommendations

There are a number of situations in which even the recommendations given by the Joint Parliamentary Committee have not been implemented. Following is one such case study: In Shillong, Umshyrpi College was established in 1994 by Muslims of Meghalaya. For a long time the College Committee has been requesting the State Government to withdraw the acquisition proceedings in respect of the Wakf land at Grove Side, Keating Road, Shillong and to allot it to the College for its expansion. The Wakf Board and the Mutawalli of the Wakf concerned, namely Golam Rahman, Wakf Estate, have approved the proposal. Even the Joint Parliamentary Committee recommended it to the Chief Minister and the Union Minister of Welfare wrote to him in this regard. But this work has not yet been done though the land required by the College is lying in disuse. The Central Government may consider taking up the matter with Meghalaya Government and asking the latter to pass the necessary order withdrawing the acquisition proceedings in respect of the said property and allotting it to Umshyrpi College.

A Case Study of National Capital Territory of Delhi

The Government of India acquired large areas of land between 1911 and 1915 for construction of the New Capital/Extension of Delhi city. A number of Wakf properties were also acquired although compensation was not received or accepted in case of many of these properties. In 1940, individual agreements were made by the Government of India in 42 cases with the Sunni-Majlis-e-Auqaf (predecessor of Delhi Wakf Board) permitting the use of the properties for religious purposes. By notification in the Delhi Gazette in 1970 a large number of properties, including those under agreement, were declared as Wakf properties. This was challenged by over 300 suits in the District Courts by the Land & Development Officer (L&DO) and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), both under the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

Between 1974 and 1984 four high-powered committees examined the disputes between the parties. The matter was also examined by a Group of Ministers comprising six Cabinet ministers. A Committee of Officers including representatives from the Ministry of Works and Housing, Ministry of Home Affairs, Delhi Development Authority, Land & Development Officer and the Delhi Wakf Board surveyed the properties in detail to assess the nature of each property in the context of the requirements for development of the capital city. They verified that in the case of 123 properties it was clear that they could be classified as Wakf properties and recommended that they be transferred to the Delhi Wakf Board. The Government of India approved the recommendation of the Committee on 31.1.84 and ordered the transfer of 123 properties (61 in the control of L&DO and 62 in the control of the DDA). Besides these 123 properties, it was found by the Committee of Officers that there were 40 other properties which were also Wakf properties but which were situated inside government properties such as public parks. It was decided that in respect of these properties the ownership would continue to vest with the government and the Delhi Wakf Board would be permitted to use them as Wakf properties.

In spite of the above mandates, as a consequence of a writ petition, the Delhi High Court on 1 June 1984 ordered that ‘status quo regarding the property should be maintained and possession should be retained by the government’. The Union of India has stated in its reply before the High Court that, only after thorough scrutiny of the notified Wakf properties and verification at site, it was decided to transfer to the Delhi Wakf Board only such properties which were:

i. Clearly Wakf in nature,

ii. Not required for public utilities and

iii. Could clearly be separated from the adjacent public buildings.

iv. The transfer of Wakf properties to Delhi Wakf Board is for their effective management and in the public interest.

v. Wakf properties that did not exist at site but had been notified in the Gazette were ignored.

Accordingly all disputes between the Government agencies and the Delhi Wakf Board had come to an end and all pending cases from both sides were to be withdrawn from the courts. However, due to the interim stay of 6 June 1984 no further action has been taken in this regard. It is sad that even after 22 years and 112 listings of the case the matter is not heard due to lack of enthusiasm on the part of the Government.

During the intervening 22 years the Wakf properties have been extensively encroached upon and this is an ongoing process. It would be seen that the Delhi Wakf Board has effectively been deprived of the use of its valuable properties. It has been unable to generate resources from its assets to discharge its statutory Wakf obligations and is currently impoverished.

In 2003 the market value of these 123 properties was estimated at about Rs. 3,000 crores by the petitioners. Property prices in Delhi have since doubled. Therefore these Wakf properties could now be valued at Rs. 6,000 crores. Due to the protracted litigation their economic value could not be tapped. If the commercial potential is now exploited it could generate enough resources to meet many needs of the Muslim community in Delhi. The Government of India may consider instructing its law officer to take active interest in the matter and have the long pending court matter disposed of at the earliest. This could be done by getting legal support upgraded and imparting overdue urgency to the finalization of this case.

4. Overcoming Constraints: Some Recommendations

4.1 Organizational Reforms

This chapter brings to light the importance of Wakf as a socio-religious institution almost equivalent to the present day ‘non-government organizations’ involved in welfare activities. However, at present, the management of Wakf properties is seriously impaired both due to high incidence of litigation and poor management. Often important Wakf cases, and thereby valuable properties, are lost because of lack of financial and administrative resources. Therefore strengthening Wakf Boards administratively with necessary financial and legal back-up is absolutely necessary. High legislative, administrative and judicial priority should be accorded to Wakf in order to improve the management of about five lakh Wakf properties spread across India. Governments both at the centre and in the states have, perhaps because of their heavy preoccupations, found it fit just to maintain the status quo, without realizing the high potential that Wakfs have both for generating wealth and meeting the welfare requirements of the poor and the needy. With appropriate legislative and legal empowerment as indicated in this chapter, the management of Wakf properties can be revitalized so as to make them not only financially viable but also rewarding. Following are some recommendations designed to improve the management and functioning of the Wakfs across India.

It appears to be essential to provide a technical advisory body for development of Wakf properties both at the state and national levels. This body may comprise representatives from state Wakfs Boards, area experts from institutions such as School of Planning and Architecture, National Institute of Design and IITs and academics such as sociologists, economists, financial and legal experts. A representative from the appropriate government department should also be part of this body. Any Wakf property whose current undeveloped market value is estimated to be Rs. 1 crore or more, or whose area is more than one bigha in urban and above 2 acres in rural parts of India should be referred to the Technical Advisory Body. All Wakf properties should be developed, mortgaged or encumbered only with the concurrence of the State or Central Technical Advisory Body as the case may be.

Ø Woman Representation: It is of utmost importance to provide for at least two women each in the Central Wakf Council and each state Wakf Board. Besides providing gender equity this will help in improving direct access to welfare measures for women and children.

Ø Composition of the Central Wakf Council (CWC): A Union Minister occupies the position as the ex-officio President of the Central Wakf Council. Given his preoccupations, often the Council is not able to prepare and take timely action on matters of urgency. It is, therefore, proposed that a full-time President should be appointed from eminent persons like retired high court judges, chancellors and vice chancellors of central universities and former chiefs of state Wakf Boards. The President may hold office for a period of three years. The other members of the Central Wakf Council could be nominated from a list of eminent Muslims drawn from various professions such as architects, doctors, lawyers, chartered accountants and academicians. The representation of MPs and MLAs as at present may be combined and their gross number in each state Wakf Board may be reduced from the existing four to two. The Secretary of the Central Wakf Council should be an officer of the rank of at least Joint Secretary to Government of India so that meaningful and effective communication and interaction with government authorities is facilitated. In order to be effective, this officer must have a good knowledge of Wakf matters, Muslim scriptures and proficiency in Urdu.

Ø State Wakf Boards: The chairmen and members of the state Wakf Board can be selected from a list of eminent persons in each state. For example, a retired high court judge, the former vice chancellors, and those who have established Muslim educational institutions of repute should be considered for appointment to the Wakf Board. The other members of the Wakf Boards can be nominated from a list of Muslim professionals drawn from various professions such as architects, doctors, lawyers, chartered accountants and academicians. The representation of MPs and MLAs as at present may be combined and their gross number in each state Wakf Board may be reduced from the existing four to two. The Act does not provide any qualification for a person to be appointed by the state Government as Chief Executive Officer of the Board. It has been found that in cases where the Chief Executive Officer is not high ranking in the hierarchy of state bureaucracy the interests of the Board often suffer. It is, therefore, necessary that the Chief Executive Officer must be full-time and must rank with senior officers of the state Government. Ideally a Class I Officer of All India or Central Services directly recruited through UPSC should be appointed as CEO.

Ø Group A Officers for Wakfs: There is a strong case to create a new cadre of officers to manage the affairs of State Wakf Boards and Central Wakf Council. It is estimated that up to 200 Group A officers are needed to service Wakf affairs across India. The government may, therefore, consider creating a new cadre of officers to be recruited by the UPSC so that they can deal with the specific affairs of the Wakfs efficiently. Such officers, however, should have knowledge of Islamic law and Urdu, as most of the documents relating to Wakfs are in that language. Some officers of this cadre could, subject to the concurrence of the Central Haj Committee, be seconded to the Central and State Haj Committees for giving them administrative support.

Ø Maintenance of Accounts: It is recommended that all the Wakfs are compulsorily brought under the scheme of ‘financial audit’.

Ø National & State Wakf Development Corporations: A National Wakf Development Corporation may be constituted by the central Government with a revolving corpus fund of Rs. 500 crores. It would also be advisable to seek out matching funds to be added to the corpus from the community and NGOs. The CMD of this corporation should be well versed in Muslim religious practices and be proficient in Urdu. The corporation may continue providing financial and technical help for development of Wakf properties with a view to enhance Wakf resources. Similar corporations should be established in all the states.

Ø Ajmer Dargah Act needs to be amended: The Wakf Act 1954 was amended in 1995. Now some more amendments are being suggested in this Report. However, the Dargah Khwaja Saheb Ajmer Act 1955 has never been amended while the problems there are the same as in the case of all other Wakfs in the rest of India. Hence it is necessary to introduce comprehensive changes in the Dargah Khwaja Saheb Ajmer Act also.

4.2 Legal and Administrative Remedies

Ø Removal of Avoidable Judicial Dichotomy: Amendment of the Wakf Act Section (6) sub-section (1): The Supreme Court in Board of Muslim Wakf, Rajasthan vs Radha Kishan and Others stated that where a non-Muslim is in possession of a certain property his right, title and interest therein cannot be put in jeopardy merely because the property is included in the list of Wakfs. Such a person is not required to file a suit (within a period of one year) for declaration of his title, as required in the Wakf Act. That is to say, the special rule of limitation laid down in the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 6 is not applicable to non-Muslims. Such interpretation is detrimental to the interests of Wakf and may well tend to encourage encroachments. Section 6 may therefore be amended to avoid the confusion and the amendment should be given retrospective effect from the date of notification of the property as Wakf. In Section 6 (1) of the Wakf Act 1995 after the expression "or any person interested therein" the following words may be added "irrespective of his/her/its religion".

Ø Enhanced Lease Period: Increase the maximum period of lease of Wakf properties from 3 to 30 years where the property is used by registered charitable societies or trusts for building and/or running educational or health care institutions, or for other social and economic developmental purposes consistent with the objects of the Wakf (if any specified) and as permissible under Islamic law.

Ø Define ‘Encroacher’: The definition of ‘Encroacher’ needs to be inserted in Section 3. This definition should say that ‘Encroacher’ means "any person occupying the Wakf premises without the authority of law and includes a person whose tenancy, lease or licence has expired or has been terminated by the Board, or who has altered the property leased out or occupied by him without the prior written permission of the Wakf Board concerned". The inclusion of this definition will help the Wakf Boards in removing encroachments. Secondly, a person occupying the Wakf premises should be included in the definition of "person interested". Thirdly, the "Wakf premises" should be defined to mean "any Mosque, Graveyard, Mazar, Takiya, Eidgah, Imambara, Dargah, Khanqah, Maqbara, Anjuman and land appurtenant or belonging to them, the property dedicated for their maintenance, the property purchased from their income, the land, garden, well, baoli, school, hospital and other institutions dedicated as Wakf and the passages used leading to the Wakf premises". This definition will help in the proceedings under Section 54, for removal of unauthorized occupants of Wakf property.

Ø Rent Control Act: Often the Rent Control Act (RCA) provides protection to the tenants in such a way that the owners lose incentive to develop and maintain properties. Wakf properties are in the purview of RCAs in most of the states. Thus the application of the RCA to Wakfs is damaging the noble interests of Wakfs and hurting the entitlements of the beneficiaries. Therefore, an amendment exempting the Wakf properties from the purview of the RCA within the Wakf Act is urgently needed. This can be done by introducing an overriding provision in the Wakf Act.

Ø Extension of Time for Recovery from Adverse Possession: The Public Wakf (Extension) of Limitation Act, 1959 facilitated the recovery of properties forming part of public Wakfs by way of suits. Under the said Act the time for filing suits for recovery of Wakf properties against adverse possession was extended till 31 December 1970. Various states extended the said time further; these are as follows:

Bihar & UT Delhi till 31 December 1985
Haryana till 31 December 1975
Madhya Pradesh till 31 December 1983
Himachal Pradesh till 31 December 1978
Orissa till 31 December 1981
Rajasthan till 31 December 1980
West Bengal till 31 December 1976

However, since 1947, most state Wakf Boards were either not properly constituted or were not sufficiently equipped to utilize or take advantage of the periods of extension of limitation. Although the administration and supervision of public works is the statutory obligation of the State, often for very long periods there has existed a virtual vacuum or absence of Wakf administration. Consequently, a large number of Wakf properties have been subjected to adverse possession and suits for recovery of the same have become time-barred. Therefore, the period of limitation should be extended till 2035 with retrospective effect. Otherwise, very valuable properties would stand unfairly encroached upon and appropriated by strangers. This would be tantamount to a collective failure of the State Wakf machinery. Due to their inaction or insufficient action the government would be deemed to be a party to the undue loss/shrinking of Wakf properties. Such failure on the part of the State and/or the statutory bodies entrusted with safeguarding/managing/developing/administering Wakf properties has caused disquiet in the Muslim community.

Ø The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act, 1958: This Act has often been at cross purposes with the Wakf Act. Very often the former has an overriding effect. There are innumerable cases where the Wakf property, despite being a place of worship and of religious reverence, cannot be touched by the Wakf Board because it is declared a protected monument. Given the present state of a large number of Wakf properties under the control of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), it would only be proper if their lists are annually reviewed and their condition is assessed in a joint meeting of senior officers of the ASI with the representatives of the Central Wakf Council. The minutes should be signed by both the parties, copies should be preserved by both of them as well as the ministries concerned.

Ø Thika Act : The West Bengal Assembly in 1981 enacted a Thika and Other Tenancies and Lands (Acquisition and Regulations) Act popularly known as the Thika Act which was amended in 2001. By virtue of this Act the tenants of a large number of properties across the state became their owners. While the Act exempts the application of Thika Act to government and municipal properties, the same benefit was not extended to cover Wakf properties. Consequently the Wakf Board lost a large number of properties and income therefrom. Efforts have been made by the Wakf Board and NGOs to seek exemption of Wakf land from the Thika Act. The West Bengal Government may be advised to accord the solicited exemption.

Ø The Committee is of the firm view that law should not be used for acquiring Wakf properties and recommends that to ensure this on a permanent basis the Government should take appropriate action.

Ø Wakf Rules: Even after a lapse of eleven years since the Wakf Act 1995 was enacted, a large number of states have not framed the Wakf Rules; this is one of the main reasons for non-implementation of the provisions of the Wakf Act and perpetuation of corruption and lack of accountability. Refresher training courses are to be offered regularly so that the staff of the State Wakf Boards are adequately trained. This work could be supervised by the Central Wakf Council.

4.3 Enabling Legal Provisions
Ø
Amendments to Wakf Act 1995

The Committee suggests that the following issues should be dealt with in the Wakf Act 1995 in such a way that the state Wakf Boards become effective and are empowered to properly deal with the removal of encroachment of Wakf properties. Additionally it has been observed that the Wakf Tribunals as notified in the Wakf Act have been found to be not as effective as they were envisaged to be (Section 83 and 84). The primary reason is that the members of the state judicial service who preside over the Wakf Tribunals normally hold dual or multiple charges, i.e., as district, sessions or civil judge. Consequently, they have paucity of time in attending to Wakf matters and the Tribunals in some instances sit only a few days in a month. It is common knowledge that delay in adjudication of properties especially suffering from encroachment/unauthorized construction/illegal occupation/misuse creates its own resultant problems. Additionally the Wakf Board is deprived of the legitimate use of and profits accruing from the property. It would therefore be appropriate to amend Section 83 (4) of the Wakf Act to specify that the Wakf Tribunal will be manned by a full-time presiding officer appointed exclusively for Wakf purposes. The Wakf Tribunal would also have the power to give the interim relief and award damages etc., as the case may be.

According to Islamic precepts the ownership of Wakfs rests only with God, the Mutawallis are the managers of the properties and the usufruct is meant only for the poor and needy. These principles do not get reflected in a number of other laws that have relevance to proper implementation of the Wakf Act. Wakf deserves to get benefited in two ways: firstly, some enactments that are found in various laws need to be amended to facilitate the functioning of Wakfs and, secondly there are a few other Acts that offer empowerment in such a way that Wakf Boards can take advantage of by getting legally empowered. The state level examples for both the above types are given below:

Ø Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act

All Wakfs as notified in the Gazette should be treated as public premises. Wakfs are meant for a large section of the public. Some activities of Wakfs such as running schools, orphanages, monthly financial assistance to the needy, are philanthropic and secular in nature. Any encroachment on these properties should be treated like encroachment on government land. The Public Permises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupation) Act, 1971 should be applied to remove encroachment from Wakf properties and arrears of rent, at market rates, should be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

Ø Other Legal Structures which can empower Wakfs

As stated in the beginning of this chapter the character of Wakf properties is quite different from privately held properties. The ownership of Wakf properties is vested in God, understood in a mundane sense as an artificial juridical person. And, the usufruct invariably belongs to the downtrodden, the poor and the needy. Yet, the state and central legislation does not usually take cognizance of such difference. While the exemption of Wakf properties from some enactments would serve the greater philanthropic purpose of Wakf properties, appropriate though minor amendments in the following Acts would strengthen the functioning of the Wakfs without in any way hurting their general public objective. Government may like to take necessary action after consulting Wakf Boards and enlightened public opinion. Some of such enactments are:

-- Rent Control Act, Land Reforms Act
-- Agricultural Land Ceilings Act
-- Urban Land Ceiling Act
-- Registration of Properties Act
-- Tenancy Act
-- Stamp Duty Act
--
Court Fee Act
-- Income-tax Act
-- Private Forest Vesting & Assignments Act

5. Summing up

This chapter brings to light the deeper malaise and misuse of the Wakf properties both by individuals and institutions. Such a state of affairs exists due to a number of organizational, managerial and legal impediments. The information provided above should be sufficient to initiate corrective action especially by the governments and the legal system which will enable the Wakfs to put the properties to good use for expanding and augmenting and putting at a proper level the welfare activities of Wakfs. This would supplement to some extent the broad based ameliorative endeavours of the State which necessarily have a massive magnitude. This will also be a step towards self-reliance by the Muslim community. It is possible to use the Wakf properties to put in place world class facilities such as universities and colleges, hospitals and health centres and convention centres. The properties can also be used to put up old age homes, polytechnics and coaching centres.


[ Subscribe | Contact Us | Archives | Khoj | Aman ]
[ Letter to editor  ]

Copyrights © 2002, Sabrang Communications & Publishing Pvt. Ltd.